Stop MP lies & corruption

Home » Iain Duncan Smith » Should Iain Duncan Smith be sacked?

Should Iain Duncan Smith be sacked?

Poll: Should Iain Duncan Smith be sacked?

Poll: Should Iain Duncan Smith be sacked?

The articles thought to have been breached by the Tories are as follows:

* The right to independent living –
(UNCRPD Article 19)

* The right to work –
(ICESCR Article 6 and UNCRPD Article 27)

* The right to fair and just conditions of employment –
(ICESCR Article 7 and UNCRPD Article 27)

* The right to social security –
(ICESCR Article 9)

* The right to social protection –
(UNCRPD Article 28)

* The right to an adequate standard of living –
(ICESCR Article 11 and UNCRPD Article 28)

Here is a collection of evidence but the UN will be gathering even more:

There are three versions of a report are available on the Just Fair website:

The full report;
Easy read report;
A summary report;

Evidence – Just Fair. Online Survey of Disabled People and allies. Excel Version.
http://alturl.com/6uprz

Evidence – Just Fair. Online survey of disabled people and their allies. Part 1 (DOCX)
http://alturl.com/27q9c

Evidence – Just Fair. Online survey of disabled people and their allies. Part 2. (DOCX)
http://alturl.com/pd4qb

Evidence – Just Fair. Emailed case-studies from disabled people and their allies. (DOCX)
http://alturl.com/6cw8i

Evidence for UN which can be verified via the families contactable via the original reports
http://alturl.com/g5pm2

The full report rigorously examines the available evidence in the light of the obligations contained within ICESCR and UNCRPD, and also draws on the experience of disabled people. Key quotes from the report include the following:

The right to independent living

“There is prima facie evidence that [the local housing allowance and the size criteria in social housing] are retrogressive,
threatening disabled people’s occupation of accessible and affordable housing to enable them to live independently, exercising  their right to choose where they live on an equal basis with others.”

“…. when evaluating the Government’s final decision to proceed with the closure of the [Independent Living Fund]… any change  in support that threatens fund users’ enjoyment of the right to independent living would constitute impermissible
retrogression in relation to UNCRPD Article 19.”

“Given the critical role of social care services in facilitating independent living, we recommend that the Government ensures
sufficient investment is directed towards ensuring that disabled people receive the support they need to exercise their right
to independent living.”

“Despite the complexity and limitations of cumulative impact assessments, the evidence does appear to show that the JCHR’s
concerns about the cumulative impact of a number of reforms and policy changes on independent living have been realised. If
disabled people are hit by two, three, four or even more separate changes to benefits, social care and other services, they
lose much of the support they need to live independently in the community in terms of UNCRPD Article 19.”

“…. the importance of fulfilling disabled people’s right to independent living is such that serious consideration should be
given to incorporating UNCRPD Article 19 (and related international human rights protections) into UK domestic law. This could be done so as to provide an overarching statutory duty on all areas of Government to take account of the need to respect, protect and fulfil disabled people’s right to independent living, and a duty to avoid retrogression, in all relevant
policymaking.”

The rights to work, to social security and to an adequate standard of living

“… there continue to be significant barriers to disabled people’s access to the labour market, compromising their enjoyment of
the right to work and the right to fair and just conditions of employment.”

“The key concern in relation to employment and support allowance, and the operation of the work capability assessment, is that the structure of the benefit and the frequency of inaccurate assessments leaves many people with long term health conditions in a no-man’s land – neither eligible for out of work benefits nor able to undertake paid work. This failure to provide income replacement benefits to disabled people and people with long term health conditions when they are unable to work constitutes a failure to respect, protect and fulfil disabled people’s right to social security … and, for many disabled people, their right to an adequate standard of living….”

“[Disabled people] are disproportionately affected by the reduced availability of advice services, which has an impact on
their enjoyment of their… right to social security and, for many, an adequate standard of living.”

“There are a number of factors that increase the risk of disabled people becoming destitute, which reflect a failure to comply
with the minimum core obligations under ICESCR and UNCRPD and to guarantee their rights to social security, social protection and an adequate standard of living…. appropriate recommendations include refocusing the ethos and performance management of DWP and JobCentre Plus so that their primary responsibility is to ensure claimants are able to support themselves and their families – by being supported to enjoy their rights to work, to social security and to an adequate standard of living…”

Advertisements

10 Comments

  1. Chris says:

    This man is personally responsible for the death of thousands because he deliberately chose to ignore all the evidence in favour of his ‘belief’ he was right. The man has no moral compass and history should record him for what he is…… A habitual liar who has no respect for the voters or his fellow MP’s! The Mand is a disgrace!!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. We always insult our politicians (of all parties), but I genuinely believe that this man is insane. His megalomanic ‘crusade’ against the sick and disabled amounts to crime against humanity, when he KNOWINGLY inflicts unnecessary hardship on vulnerable people and clearly enjoys doing so. Being sacked from his job or being voted out of office is not enough – he should be brought to justice and jailed for what he has done, with the proviso that he is NEVER allowed to hold public office again

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Doc Weary says:

    I have no words to describe my feelings toward this piece of excrement who walks amongst us.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Anthony Murphy says:

    Pity we could only vote on one of them I would have him sacked put on trial flogged then put on work force

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Ooh yes or no… let me think? 60,000 disabled dead in 4 years due to botched reforms, disabled and carers thrown into penury through non-payment of benefits, 2 million children below the poverty line… I think thats a major YES, don’t you?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Kevin Munden says:

    This parasite should be in jail for mass genocide he is nothing a piece of dog shit & is full of hatred & venom

    Liked by 1 person

  7. chris Hartley says:

    Sadistic, Heartless, Enjoys seeing people commit suicide. Causing starvation and Homelessness. Typical Tory.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. britexpat191 says:

    This vile psychopath is Britain’s most prolific serial killer and should be on trial for murder.

    Liked by 2 people

  9. auntiecon says:

    This smarmy smug piece of pig shit disgusts me – brags that he could live on £53 a week while living in his multi-millionaire in-laws’ mansion.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: